![jojo is just gay porn reddit post e jojo is just gay porn reddit post e](https://i0.wp.com/alexusrenee.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2021/01/Stone-Free-JoJo.jpg)
Easy money, because you don't have to basically collect money from that many people, but the problem is if you're a journalist and you work for one of these organizations, you have to kind of sell your soul. They sell their influence to people that want to write big checks and. Almost nobody wants to pay the paywall so what do you do? You basically become like Huffington Post and like Gizmodo and operations like that basically are whores. And most of the newspaper industry failed to transition from the current method of monetizing through subscription and print ads, which were very lucrative, to a model that was viable for paying expensive salaries with online ads. And as the world became more digital, there was more of an emphasis on online ads. It was about basically truth and empowering people to make informed decisions and I think somewhere in the last 30 years the economic model changed because there was no longer money to be made selling subscriptions. I think that journalism used to be kind of an honorable practice. Monster, YT0:02:37: "are reporters cursing themselves reporting the breach?" I think there are reporters that are cursing themselves because they're engaging in propaganda. It is a data privacy problem, and it requires. I guess, you know, you can get into like wordsmithing and whatever, you know. Monster, YT0:02:20: Yeah no, breaches of a backup server is still a breach, yeah. I can unpack that if you want, but it's not a good move. I think that there was a backup that was hijacked and that it's making the rounds and there are a bunch of guys who I actually think are cursing themselves by trafficking in that data. Can you guys hear me? Yeah, well anyway I don't know that it is a breach of our production systems, I think that's the wrong word. Monster, YT0:01:52: "can anyone hear anything". So we haven't made a formal statement along those lines, what we've done is we've announced to our customers, "hey, your personal data may be out there" and encouraged people to. I think that the data was intercepted and the method that was used to be able to intercept that data was a method that I think is subject to review. I don't think there's any way to deny that. Yeah, I mean yeah there was a hijack of data that should not have been hijacked. Monster, YT0:01:05: No, not a state of denial, come on bro. And we'll figure out exactly how it was done, and cyber forensics people will navigate that, and they will advise us on what we should do, and law enforcement's involved. It had a backup, as we were doing remote backup of our data, and I think that was intercepted. Monster, YT0:00:28: No, I think that there was a non-active host. But we're going to find exactly where it was, we're going to find exactly how it was moved, and. I don't think that there is an active vulnerability that would have allowed that scale of data haul. And I'm not going to say where the backup was found but I believe it was a backup and it wasn't the live data. working hypothesis is that it was a backup.